The backups are protected by a security key only known to a backup operator or sysadmin. The services also use rsync-like algorithms, and only backup data that has been changed since the last dump. They encrypt and store data in Amazon S3. Systematic Reviews, 4(6), 1-6.Most seasoned sysadmins recommend and follow the 3-2-1 rule:Ī Tarsnap service is a secure online backup system for Linux, OSX, *BSD or UNIX-like system. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module. Rathbone, J., Carter, M., Hoffmann, T., & Glasziou, P. Find Duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in Systematic Review. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 103(4), 184–188. Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches. Kwon, Y., Lemieux, M., McTavish, J., & Wathen, N. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 104(3), 240–243. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. This process was adapted from Kwon (2015).īramer, W. Instead, move them to a separate sheet for duplicates, to track numbers. Scan through the list, looking for duplicate titlesĬheck the additional information (author, journal, volume, page number) to make sure it matches before designating a duplicateĭO NOT delete duplicate records. Use this formula =LEFT(C2,30) where C2 is the cell you are truncatingĬopy the formula down the length of the column to truncate it all Replace punctuation (dashes, periods, question marks, semi colons, colons) in titles with spaces using the find and replace tool.įor titles, truncating (to 30 characters, for example, though this number is arbitrary) will sometimes find more duplicates. Select conditional formatting from the Home ribbon, go to Highlight Cells Rules, then Duplicate Values. (Start with titles, though you can use this same process for any other columns you choose, such as DOI.) You need to track the number of duplicate articles you remove for either reason for inclusion in your prisma diagram.Įxport your references to a CSV or Excel file. In most cases, you will need to first use conditional formatting in Excel to identify duplicates, then do a final scan manually. This requires careful analysis because you don't want to leave out important articles. The Cochrane Handbook offers some good suggestions for authors here:, and recommends that studies (not reports) serve as the reporting unit ( ). Identifying multiple articles published from the same data set is a bit more complicated. Whichever process you decide to follow, document it and report it accurately in your article. Automatic tools are not perfect, so both methods should be used for accurate deduplication. Spotify deduplicator review manual#Identifying and removing duplicate records is necessary because multiple databases often index overlapping journals. Your method of deduplication may depend on the number of articles included in your review: manual deduplication is more realistic with smaller numbers, whereas larger numbers may require automatic tools. If undetected, either could create bias in the conclusions of your review. The second is the issue of multiple articles published from the same data set. The first is the removal of identical records retrieved from multiple databases. There are two forms of deduplication to consider when conducting a systematic review.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |